Timeline for Should we have a collection of aviation related humor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2015 at 19:03 | comment | added | Pondlife | At least one 'joke' has sadly proven me right | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 15:08 | comment | added | fooot | @DavidRicherby I was not accusing you personally of bait and switch but suggesting it of the community as a whole. And I agree with that next comment. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 15:03 | comment | added | David Richerby | @fooot "Also we waited almost a week and received no negative feedback here." Indeed. At the time the thread was created, it was definitely reasonable to assume that the community was supportive. It's unfortunate that nobody who disagreed noticed the discussion before the question was posted. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 14:58 | comment | added | David Richerby | @fooot Absolutely not. I did not bait: I took no action whatsoever that could be seen as supporting the question (because I was ignorant of its existence and of this discussion on Meta). I did not switch: it was impossible for me to change from pro to anti because I was never pro. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 14:44 | comment | added | fooot | @DavidRicherby it's also "bait and switch" if a user (could be anyone) asks on meta "can I ask this question," only receives positive responses, asks the question, and then it gets closed. I would have expected people with such strong opinions about what is or is not acceptable on this site to visit meta more often. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 10:12 | comment | added | David Richerby | @fooot "yes and ours is attracting views and users as well." And if we post porn or give away free beer we'll attract views and users, too. But will any of them stay and contribute usefully to the site? Attracting people by a misrepresentation of what we're about isn't a good way of attracting people: in fact, it's normally referred to by the pejorative term "bait and switch". | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 10:11 | comment | added | SentryRaven | Why was this question tagged with categories? Are the categories added to limit the scope of jokes or were they added after jokes are posted? In my opinion, the joke question (should it be unlocked, which I am not in favor of) should not contain any tags. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 8:38 | comment | added | Federico | @ratchetfreak it actually was in the "hot meta post" list shown in the main site homepage | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 7:49 | comment | added | ratchet freak | @fooot the problem with meta is that there is a very low amount of people visiting it, I only found out about this meta question after the joke question was posted. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 3:22 | comment | added | raptortech97 | @fooot I agree that the process didn't work as well as it could have, but I think people responded to seeing the question and it's answers and deciding it should be closed. For me, at least a part of the decision was based on the answers it received - some good ones, but also a few offensive ones, and nothing spectacular. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 1:51 | comment | added | Andrew T. | @Farhan not trying to shoot anyone down, but popularity (view count) doesn't ensure on-topicness. If it's off-topic (as mentioned in the tour, i.e. Questions that are primarily opinion-based, Questions with too many possible answers [...]), then it should be closed. In addition of that, there's no answer that's acceptable, which is why it's not suitable as Q&A format. (Of course as a merely spectator on this site, I don't really have power to affect the policy, but that's my 2 cents based on reading other metas) | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 1:49 | comment | added | fooot | @Farhan yes and ours is attracting views and users as well. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 1:07 | comment | added | Farhan | @fooot Another point to consider is that both those posts have almost half million and a million views. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 0:59 | comment | added | fooot | Also we waited almost a week and received no negative feedback here. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 0:57 | comment | added | fooot | I interpreted the lock as indicating that the fun ran its course. With over 100 answers, how many people are going to read a new one on the last page? And like with any other "question", if it doesn't interest someone, they don't need to go there. I'm sure ours will end up locked someday too but there's a reason the ones on SO are there and not deleted. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 19:36 | comment | added | Pondlife | I agree. Both 'precedents' have quite a number of deleted answers, removed images, and confused people who don't get the jokes. Humour is a notoriously tricky area, especially in an international environment: one person laughs at what another finds boring, or even offensive. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 19:14 | history | answered | ratchet freak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |