Jonathan - that F35 question is slightly better now after the edits, but I would politely suggest it was a bad question. It was badly written, with poor grammar, no clear point, and had a strange rant in it about an in game character, which is nothing to do with aviation. That one was "dissed" for very good reasons. Whee you have multiple people downvoting or commenting, it is safer to assume you need to change, not that they are all malicious or wrong.

This is the same all over the Stack Exchange network. Remember that although there are exceptions, almost everyone votes the question, not the poster, so a bunch of downvotes or negative comments should be taken as constructive criticism.

Jonathan - that F35 question is slightly better now after the edits, but I would politely suggest it was a bad question. It was badly written, with poor grammar, no clear point, and had a strange rant in it about an in game character, which is nothing to do with aviation. That one was "dissed" for very good reasons. When you have multiple people downvoting or commenting, it is safer to assume you need to change, not that they are all malicious or wrong.

This is the same all over the Stack Exchange network. Remember that although there are exceptions, almost everyone votes the question, not the poster, so a bunch of downvotes or negative comments should be taken as constructive criticism.