Timeline for Why was this question deleted, not just closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2023 at 14:46 | comment | added | Ralph J Mod | And... 10 hours later, your question has two really excellent answers! (One of those, by a user who VTC'd the original question.) | |
| May 22, 2023 at 4:28 | comment | added | Ralph J Mod | Nice question, clearly stated, useful to others - +1'd. What you posted is likely to get a couple of good answers, especially not starting off with the -2 score. Nice job! | |
| May 22, 2023 at 3:02 | comment | added | Someone | @RalphJ thank you! I posted aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/99208/… . | |
| May 21, 2023 at 14:46 | comment | added | Ralph J Mod | That understanding is much better than what was expressed in the other question. If you want to ask that, I'd recommend starting a new thread, asking your question, and not inheriting the DV that the other one had. | |
| May 21, 2023 at 14:38 | comment | added | Someone | @RalphJ I understood it as asking whether the data input to a glass cockpit is digital or analog. Of course, the data has to be analog at some point (air pressure, for example, can't be directly measured digitally), and it has to be digital at some point (otherwise the computer couldn't handle it), so I would probably have changed it to ask at what point the data is converted from analog to digital. | |
| May 21, 2023 at 14:33 | comment | added | Ralph J Mod | It was a poorly written, poorly reasoned question that was down-voted & had attracted an AI / spam answer. If you think you can turn it into a quality question, I can un-delete it, but what was being asked seemed to make no sense as written. Just fixing the grammar won't improve the underlying quality issue. | |
| May 21, 2023 at 14:28 | history | asked | Someone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |