9
$\begingroup$

I just edited a question about FAA regulations applying to aircraft wings incorrectly tagged "faa-wings"

I added a description (based on copying chunks from Wikipedia and an FAA document) to the tag to make clear that the presumed creator of that tag (who wrote the only two prior questions with that tag) mean it to apply to the FAA pilot-proficiency program, not to actual wings.

Is this little-used tag useful? Could it be renamed something that is less likely to be applied in error (or is a good tag description enough)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I've made the change suggested by Pondlife and renamed faa-wings to faa-wings-program. This should make it less confusing for people. $\endgroup$
    – Bret Copeland StaffMod
    Commented May 18, 2015 at 12:24

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
13
$\begingroup$

It's hard to say if it's useful or not: it only has two questions today but that doesn't mean we won't get more in the future. I think we should leave it there, but rename it to .

And if someone has a question on FAA regulations applied to aircraft wings then IMO the most appropriate tagging is plus .

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I agree 100%... $\endgroup$
    – Lnafziger Mod
    Commented May 15, 2015 at 15:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .