-4
$\begingroup$

Should we have a new reason for close votes which encompasses a case where the question is so sloppy that it obviously contradicts itself?

I don't see that any of the existing reasons to close encompasses such a case.

Or is the more appropriate thing to do just to downvote or comment?

Example of such a question -- Why do fighter jets land faster than Jumbo commercial aircraft?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You might want to find a better example than a 5-year-old question that was well-received. $\endgroup$ – fooot Apr 22 '20 at 2:41
  • $\begingroup$ @fooot -- Why? Is it not obvious that that question contradicts itself? If your point is essentially "No, because some questions turn out to be well received even if they contradict themselves", then I guess I chose the perfect example, because it allowed you to make your point. You could consider making that an actual answer rather just a comment. I would still say that the question contradicts itself and would vote to close were there a valid reason. $\endgroup$ – quiet flyer Apr 22 '20 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ I just think you'd want to find a question that was not well received but left open because we didn't have a good reason for closing it. $\endgroup$ – fooot Apr 22 '20 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ (Never mind, I fully agree that "needs details or clarity" is an adequate reason to vote to close a question that obviously contradicts itself. $\endgroup$ – quiet flyer May 1 '20 at 15:50
5
$\begingroup$

If you think the question contradicts itself, the closest reason for closing would seem to be "needs details or clarity."

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .