Timeline for Tags for FAR and AIM or FAR-AIM?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2013 at 19:36 | comment | added | Lnafziger | Yeah, I think that we should have at least some of them. Some questions will have VERY different answers depending on whether they are operating under 91, 121, or 135 for instance. I've been using far-91 and far-135 some already. I think that with the significant operating differences between them and with the fact that some people will be much more knowledgeable about some parts than others, that we should have the individual tags so that they can be followed when desired. | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 19:29 | comment | added | voretaq7 | Part of me is wondering if we should have far91 far61, far43, etc. -- I'm not still sure how I feel about that though | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 19:23 | vote | accept | Lnafziger | ||
| Dec 25, 2013 at 19:23 | |||||
| Dec 25, 2013 at 19:23 | comment | added | Lnafziger | True, and now that I think about it, the "combined" editions do not normally have the full FARs in them either, but instead only have the FARs specific to the publication that they are combined with. Keeping them separate is probably the way to go, although part of me still wants: far, aim, far-aim, and far-amt so that I don't always have to use two tags, lol.... | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 18:45 | comment | added | voretaq7 | @lnafziger I agree with that logic, except then we'd need a tag for the FAR/AIM, one for the FAR/AMT, and one for just-plain-FAR questions - it seems like it's creating a lot of redundant tags that might still have an overlap (e.g. questions about owners performing oil changes could refer to both the FARs, the AIM, and possibly bits of the AMT Handbook) | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 18:40 | comment | added | Lnafziger | Well, my thinking is that I don't really care if the answer comes from the actual regulations or the faa guidance, I still will follow it because that's what they say to do. While they are technically different publications, you go to them both for similar reasons. That's why they are often printed together... | |
| Dec 25, 2013 at 18:39 | history | answered | voretaq7 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |