Timeline for Why do we allow ‘smart’ quotes to be replaced with 'straight' quotes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 11, 2015 at 5:58 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | Note: in one particular area, SE does suffer the plague of smart quotes: all double quotes in question titles are hacked into "smart" oblivion, even on SO. In other cases, though, I certainly agree that it's worth seriously considering use of typographically correct (which is to say, Unicode) text. | |
| Aug 11, 2015 at 0:28 | comment | added | TomMcW | Ever notice that it's always the most inconsequential things that people get the most passionate about? | |
| Aug 3, 2015 at 2:03 | history | edited | Greg Bacon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2015 at 1:58 | history | answered | Greg Bacon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |