Timeline for How to deal with serial editing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 6:37 | comment | added | Federico |
I agree on everything you said, except I wish I could agree also on that not yet.
|
|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 2:28 | comment | added | Lnafziger Mod | I know that this isn't the point of the question, but carbon footprints are a big deal with jet operators and the EU carbon tax scheme.... | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 20:15 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | @Federico There is definitely a certain amount of potential for gaming the system here, but this is why the amount of rep you can get from suggesting edits & creating tag wikis is aggressively capped. (Honestly I have a bigger problem with the spurious edits messing up good content than with people gaming the system for rep - fortunately that's not happening here (yet).) How to make "suggested edit" (and other) review queues work better has been a frequent topic of discussion behind the scenes, but it's not an easy problem to solve. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 17:16 | comment | added | Federico | Please bear in mind that the case wants to be only an example, and not the only case where such a thing has happened. Also, one could see how the user proceeds creating tags and then the tag wikis to gather reputation. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 16:54 | history | answered | voretaq7Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |