Timeline for Closing as "belongs on another StackExchange site"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 at 8:24 | comment | added | David Richerby | @reirab Of course. But "... and you should post it to eggplants.stackexchange.com" is a useful addition. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 5:34 | comment | added | reirab | @DavidRicherby "This question is off-topic here" is a valid close reason by itself. :) | |
| Nov 29, 2015 at 11:00 | comment | added | David Richerby | @digitgopher But "This question is off-topic here and belongs on another site" is a valid close reason. | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 18:28 | comment | added | reirab | @casey I think the one mentioned in this meta post is a good example. It was closed as OT here and auto-deleted, but it was actually (IMO, at least) an interesting question for Travel. Also, that meta post is already tagged as feature-request. Should I retag it as discussion so that we don't have duplicate open feature requests? | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 18:18 | comment | added | reirab |
@digitgopher True, but it does often end up being the case with Travel. The physics ones are often reasonably on-topic at either place, but since "'passenger aspects' of commercial aviation" are explicitly off-topic for Aviation (as I think they should remain,) the line between Aviation and Travel is less fuzzy.
|
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 16:13 | comment | added | digitgopher | It's worth repeating that the thought this question belongs on another site is not a valid close reason! Just because a question might seem more natural on another site doesn't mean it is necessarily out of place on Aviation. | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 2:40 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAviation/status/668982459879530496 | ||
| Nov 23, 2015 at 20:44 | answer | added | voretaq7Mod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 20:30 | comment | added | voretaq7 Mod | Related | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 20:30 | history | edited | voretaq7Mod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 23, 2015 at 19:04 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | Migration paths can be opened now that we're graduating, but generally there needs to be a strong case made for both volume of migrated questions to that destination, and low rejection rate. | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 14:06 | comment | added | casey | It could be helpful to tag a Q like this as a feature-request for that migration path and perhaps give some examples that have been migrated in the past or that are closed here that could have been migrated. | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 7:49 | history | edited | Simon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 22, 2015 at 16:20 | comment | added | Lnafziger Mod | Some of the engineering sites (mechanical, electrical, etc.) would also be good. | |
| Nov 22, 2015 at 15:01 | history | edited | Simon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 22, 2015 at 9:00 | history | asked | Simon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |